robotseatcandy:

seen at Hampshire

GOD YOU FIRSTIES CANT GET ANYTHING RIGHT THESE DAYS ITS MOTHER FUCKING Bong Hits 4 JESUS

I only make the distinction because the Supreme Court spends like 4 pages debating if the syntax of ‘Bong Hits 4 JESUS’ makes it a nonsense phrase or not. P. sure Justice Scallia asked what a ‘Bong hit’ is. Roberts (who penned the majority opinion) describes the phrase as “cryptic” and then goes on to explain to the reader that,

First, the phrase could be interpreted as an imperative: “[Take] bong hits …”—a message equivalent, as Morse explained in her declaration, to “smoke marijuana” or “use an illegal drug.” Alternatively, the phrase could be viewed as celebrating drug use—“bong hits [are a good thing],” or “[we take] bong hits”

It’s pretty funny.